Why Cutting Federal Funding for Gender-Affirming Care Is the Right and Necessary Step

The federal government’s recent move to restrict Medicare and Medicaid funding for so-called “gender-affirming care” for minors has ignited predictable outrage. Activists describe it as discriminatory. Advocacy groups frame it as a moral emergency. Critics accuse policymakers of ignoring “settled science.” But beneath the noise is a quieter, more sobering reality: for the first time…

The Pentagon’s Transgender Policy and the Moral Battle for the Military’s Soul

In early October, the Pentagon released a memo tightening enforcement of President Trump’s renewed ban on transgender service members. The new policy allows commanders to override separation boards, requires troops to appear in uniforms corresponding to their biological sex, and directs that anyone diagnosed with gender dysphoria be recommended for discharge. The memo has drawn…

Why the Supreme Court Got It Right on Gender-Affirming Care for Minors

In a landmark decision, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled by a 6–3 majority to uphold a Tennessee law that bans gender-affirming medical treatments for minors. Under this law, individuals under eighteen are barred from receiving puberty blockers, cross-sex hormones, or gender transition surgeries, treatments that have stirred controversy worldwide for their permanent effects and uncertain…

Standing Firm on Truth and Compassion: Why Taxpayer Dollars Shouldn’t Fund Gender-Affirming Treatments

As we continue to consider the Medicaid provisions in the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, today we’ll tackle one that’s really ruffling some feathers on the far left: the provision that prohibits Medicaid and CHIP from covering gender-affirming treatments for individuals of all ages. This sweeping ban, tucked into what’s now being affectionately dubbed the…

The Senate’s Shameful Filibuster: Why Protecting Women’s Sports Shouldn’t Be Controversial

This week, something remarkable happened. Gavin Newsom, one of the most left-wing governors in America, admitted that allowing biological males to compete in women’s sports is “deeply unfair.” Yes, you read that right—the same Gavin Newsom who has spent years pushing radical gender ideology is suddenly concerned about fairness. Of course, Newsom’s newfound concern has…

Fairness, Reality, and Readiness: Why Trump’s Transgender Policies on Sports and the Military Are Just Common Sense

President Trump’s recent executive orders barring transgender individuals from competing in women’s sports and restricting their access to the military aren’t about hate, discrimination, or exclusion—they’re about fairness, reality, and national security. These policies reaffirm something that an overwhelming majority of Americans—regardless of political affiliation—already understand: biological differences matter. Despite what the radical left would…

An Independent Christian Conservative Perspective on LGBTQ+ Politics: Principles, Policy, and Truth

The debate over LGBTQ+ issues remains front and center in American politics, often revealing deep cultural and ideological divides. Recent developments, such as Delaware’s Bethany Hall-Long’s executive order establishing an LGBTQ+ Commission during her brief tenure as governor, President Trump’s appointments of LGBTQ+ individuals to key positions, and Trump’s executive order affirming only two sexes,…

Balancing Rights and Responsibilities: Why Protecting Children and Privacy Matters in Missouri and Ohio’s Transgender Policies

In recent developments, Missouri and Ohio have implemented laws addressing issues related to transgender minors, igniting passionate debates about ethics, legality, and the foundational values of our society. These measures touch on deeply personal and often polarizing topics: the protection of children, parental rights, individual freedoms, and the role of the government in mediating between…