The latest media frenzy over President Trump’s stance on court rulings is nothing more than the left’s predictable hysteria over his presidency. This time, the mainstream press is in full meltdown mode over Trump’s comments affirming that while he will abide by the courts, he will also appeal decisions that block his agenda. In a…
A Felony Conviction and the Oval Office: The Perils of Presidential Immunity and Moral Compromise
The sentencing of Donald Trump to an unconditional discharge in his hush-money case—a conviction that leaves him as the first U.S. president-elect with a felony on his record—marks an extraordinary chapter in American legal, political, and moral history. Justice Merchan's decision, though couched in high-minded language about respecting the office of the presidency, sets a…
Trump’s TikTok Tango: A Tale of Flip-Flopping
Folks, it looks like President-elect Donald Trump is at it again, shaking things up in his signature style. His latest headline-grabber? A petition to the Supreme Court to delay TikTok’s divestment deadline, a sharp pivot from his 2020 “ban the app” crusade. For a man who has always prided himself on standing firm, this move…
Protecting Our Children: Balancing Compassion, Wisdom, and Constitutional Rights in Gender-Affirming Care Debate
The Supreme Court's recent deliberation on Tennessee's ban on gender-affirming care for minors has ignited a complex and deeply personal debate. As an independent Christian conservative, I approach this issue with a commitment to biblical principles, individual liberties, and the well-being of our youth. Protecting Our Children We have a profound duty to guide and…
The Supreme Court and the FCC: A Constitutional Crossroads for $8 Billion in Internet and Phone Subsidies
The Supreme Court has agreed to review the constitutionality of the Federal Communications Commission's (FCC) Universal Service Fund (USF), which allocates approximately $8 billion annually to support phone and internet services in schools, libraries, and rural areas. This decision follows a ruling by the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals that declared the funding mechanism…
Trump and Recess Appointments
The possibility of President-elect Donald Trump using recess appointments to bypass Senate confirmation and fill his Cabinet has sparked heated debate. Recess appointments, a tool enshrined in the Constitution, allow a president to temporarily fill positions when the Senate is not in session. While this strategy has been used by presidents of both parties, its…
Justice, Mercy, and the Death Penalty: Glossip v. Oklahoma
The case of Glossip v. Oklahoma, currently under review by the Supreme Court, is a sobering reminder of the complexities and moral challenges surrounding capital punishment, particularly when questions of innocence persist. Richard Glossip, a death row prisoner convicted of murder in the 1997 killing of Barry Van Treese, continues to maintain his innocence. His…
A Renewed Fight for Life: Conservative States Challenge FDA’s Abortion Pill Policies
Four months after the Supreme Court declined to hear a major challenge to the abortion drug mifepristone, a new battle is brewing that seeks to curtail its availability. Conservative states — Missouri, Kansas, and Idaho — have taken decisive action to protect life by filing an amended lawsuit in a Texas federal court. The suit…
The Supreme Court, Ghost Guns, and Government Overreach
The United States Supreme Court recently heard arguments surrounding a federal rule regulating so-called "ghost guns"—firearms assembled from kits that are untraceable and without serial numbers. The 2022 rule, implemented by the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives (ATF), seeks to address the rise in ghost guns by applying regulations that are traditionally reserved…
John Roberts and the Conservative Court: Defending Constitutional Integrity
Recent reporting from the New York Times has raised concerns over the Supreme Court’s handling of cases related to the January 6th Capitol incident. According to the piece, Chief Justice John Roberts played a pivotal role in shaping decisions that allegedly benefited former President Donald Trump. However, this narrative misses key elements of the role…
The Independent Christian Conservative 