The legal fight over mandatory detention isn’t just about one policy tweak. It’s about the basic rules of the game when the government decides who gets to stay free and who sits in detention while their case plays out. Under the Trump administration’s policy, certain noncitizens—often those with past criminal convictions or specific immigration violations—could…
Roundup, Regulation, and the Limits of Liability
At first glance, the lawsuit against Monsanto looks like a familiar story: a plaintiff claims that exposure to Roundup caused serious illness, a jury hears the evidence, and a multimillion-dollar company gets told to write a check. That’s the kind of David-versus-Goliath narrative that tends to resonate emotionally and politically. But peel back that surface…
When Wartime Immunity Meets Real-World Negligence
Sometimes the Supreme Court hands down a decision that doesn’t just split along predictable ideological lines. It flips the script entirely. That’s exactly what happened in Hencely v. Fluor Corp., where a 6–3 majority allowed a wounded U.S. soldier’s lawsuit against a military contractor to proceed. And yes, if you did a double take when…
When Church Meets State Funding: Colorado’s Preschool Mandate Showdown
At first glance, this looks like just another culture-war headline: religion versus LGBTQ rights, round 9,742. But if you slow down for a minute, this case is less about slogans and more about a genuinely hard constitutional question that doesn’t have a clean, satisfying answer. Colorado has created a universal preschool program funded by taxpayer…
The Line, the Law, and the Loophole: Should Asylum Seekers Be Turned Away?
When immigration policy hits the courtroom—especially the U.S. Supreme Court—you can be sure we’re dealing with more than just a technical dispute. We’re dealing with competing visions of law, sovereignty, and human obligation, all wrapped into one messy, politically radioactive package. At the center of this particular fight is “metering,” which is a practice where…
The Supreme Court Revives Qualified Immunity (Again)
A recent decision from the Supreme Court has dropped us right back into one of the most stubborn legal debates in modern America: qualified immunity. If you’re feeling a sense of déjà vu, that’s because this issue never really goes away. It just rotates through new fact patterns, new plaintiffs, and new frustrations. At the…
Supreme Court to Mississippi: “Yeah… You Might Have Overdone It”
When the Supreme Court of the United States steps in and revives a case instead of deciding it outright, it’s a bit like a teacher handing back a test and saying, “You didn’t totally fail… but you definitely need to show your work.” That’s essentially what happened here. The Court didn’t rule that the Mississippi…
Breonna Taylor, Broken Chains of Causation, and the Case That Collapsed
Six years after the death of Breonna Taylor, the Justice Department has moved to dismiss the remaining charges against the officers accused of falsifying the warrant used in the raid on her apartment. And if you blinked, you might have missed just how significant that is. This wasn’t just a procedural hiccup or a minor…
Trump vs. The New York Times
Last week, on Monday, September 16, President Trump decided to take his long-simmering feud with The New York Times from the podium to the courtroom, filing a $15 billion defamation lawsuit against the paper, several of its reporters, and even its publisher, Penguin Random House. The suit accused them of maliciously distorting his business record,…
Weighing the Evidence: The Federal Case Against Kilmar Abrego Garcia
I’ve previously written about the troubling deportation of Kilmar Abrego Garcia, a Maryland father who was removed from the United States without the benefit of a full and fair legal process. My position then—and now—was simple: every individual, regardless of status, deserves due process under the law. If there were grounds to believe Garcia had…
The Independent Christian Conservative 