Lock Them Up or Not? The Fight Over Mandatory Detention

The legal fight over mandatory detention isn’t just about one policy tweak. It’s about the basic rules of the game when the government decides who gets to stay free and who sits in detention while their case plays out. Under the Trump administration’s policy, certain noncitizens—often those with past criminal convictions or specific immigration violations—could…

Bond Hearings, Borders, and Biblical Justice

The recent federal court ruling requiring bond hearings for many detained migrants has added even more fuel to the immigration debate. A federal judge pushed back on a broad executive interpretation that effectively denied bond to wide categories of migrants, ruling that many are entitled to individualized bond hearings before an immigration judge. In plain…

Immigration Limbo and the Cost of Indefinite Delay

The growing population of migrants trapped in legal limbo is not merely the result of bureaucratic overload or political disagreement. It’s the predictable outcome of a system that has substituted delay for decision, hesitation for responsibility, and indefinite suspension for principled governance. The result is not neutrality but harm that’s borne most heavily by those…

When Government Authority Slips from Law into Moral Theater

The recent actions by Republican leadership in Texas and Florida aimed at the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) deserve more than reflexive applause or predictable outrage. They require sober analysis. Whatever one thinks of CAIR’s activism, rhetoric, or policy positions, the mechanism being used against it should trouble anyone who takes constitutional limits seriously. These…

Justice, Mercy, and the Voice We Dare Not Ignore

The release of Kilmar Abrego Garcia has pulled back the curtain on a tension Americans feel but rarely articulate clearly: how do we enforce immigration law firmly without trampling due process, court authority, and basic human dignity? This isn’t a left-wing question or a right-wing one. It’s an American question. And, for Christians, a deeply…

Washington’s Hobby of Breaking Its Own Rules

America’s political world lately feels like someone shook up a snow globe full of legal controversies, military disputes, and enough accusations of “sedition” to make even the Founding Fathers peek over their spectacles. First, we had Senator Mark Kelly telling U.S. troops to refuse “illegal orders,” then the Pentagon launching an investigation, and now the…

Integrity Isn’t Optional

If the past few weeks in American public life have taught us anything, it’s this: accountability is a universal need, not a partisan accessory. Whether you’re a tech titan, a big-city mayor, a former FBI director, or a Republican getting a little too comfortable in your seat, the same basic truth applies: character matters. And…

Justice, Reputation & the Peril of Precedent

In the unfolding case where Letitia James stands accused of mortgage fraud, the stakes go well beyond her own future. At its heart, this is a question about the character of our justice system: Does it serve justice or is it serving someone’s agenda? As Proverbs 16:11 reminds us: “A just weight and balance are…

The Federal Reserve Soap Opera: Supreme Court Edition

Well, folks, I called it, and I mean exactly called it. Back in my September 18 installment of The Federal Reserve Soap Opera, I said, “If I had to make an educated guess, the Supreme Court may be inclined to give Lisa Cook a short-term reprieve.” And lo and behold, that’s precisely what they did.…