In the ever-escalating cultural and constitutional war over abortion in America, the fight over mifepristone—the so-called “abortion pill”—has emerged as ground zero. Recently, Idaho, Kansas, and Missouri filed a lawsuit challenging the FDA’s loosened restrictions on mifepristone, arguing that federal approval and telehealth access undermine their pro-life laws. President Trump’s Department of Justice is asking…
Faith, Law, and the Alien Enemies Act
On Thursday, U.S. District Judge Fernando Rodriguez Jr.—appointed by President Trump himself—issued a permanent injunction against the Trump administration’s use of the Alien Enemies Act (AEA) of 1798 to deport alleged members of the violent Venezuelan gang Tren de Aragua. For those of us who stand at the intersection of faith, constitutional conservatism, and common…
Deported by Mistake, Imprisoned Abroad: What the Case of Kilmar Abrego Garcia Says About Justice, Sovereignty, and American Accountability
The saga of Kilmar Abrego Garcia is not just another bureaucratic mishap swept under the rug. It’s a constitutional crossroads, a diplomatic standoff, and a gut-check moment for a nation that prides itself on being a beacon of justice and due process. At the heart of this story is a Maryland father, a lawful resident,…
Wrong Tool for the Job: Why the Alien Enemies Act Was Misapplied
Yesterday, I wrote an article arguing that the Alien Enemies Act (AEA) was the wrong legal tool to deport members of Tren de Aragua (TdA)—a position that my fellow conservative over at The Conservative TAKE strongly disagrees with. You can read his counterargument here. While he raises some valid points, his overall argument is fundamentally…
Trump, Courts, and the Real Separation of Powers Debate
The latest media frenzy over President Trump’s stance on court rulings is nothing more than the left’s predictable hysteria over his presidency. This time, the mainstream press is in full meltdown mode over Trump’s comments affirming that while he will abide by the courts, he will also appeal decisions that block his agenda. In a…
Birthright Citizenship: A Constitutional Anchor or Antiquated Policy?
The debate over birthright citizenship has resurfaced in full force, as attorneys general from 22 states have filed suit to block President Trump’s executive order aimed at limiting this century-old practice. This issue is more than just a political or legal squabble; it strikes at the heart of what it means to be an American.…
The Supreme Court and the FCC: A Constitutional Crossroads for $8 Billion in Internet and Phone Subsidies
The Supreme Court has agreed to review the constitutionality of the Federal Communications Commission's (FCC) Universal Service Fund (USF), which allocates approximately $8 billion annually to support phone and internet services in schools, libraries, and rural areas. This decision follows a ruling by the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals that declared the funding mechanism…
Matt Gaetz Withdraws Attorney General Nomination: A Chance for a Better Path Forward
In a significant development, Matt Gaetz has withdrawn his nomination for Attorney General, citing concerns that his confirmation process could overshadow the Trump/Vance transition. His decision comes amid a swirl of controversy, including a House Ethics Committee investigation and serious allegations of misconduct. While the Ethics Committee declined to release its anticipated report on Gaetz,…
The Independent Christian Conservative 