An Analysis of the Recent Trump Asylum Ruling

On July 2, a major legal ruling shook the immigration debate when U.S. District Judge Randolph Moss struck down one of President Trump’s most aggressive attempts to rein in the chaos at the southern border. The case centered on a sweeping executive proclamation issued by the president on January 20—his first day back in office—declaring…

Swift Deportations and Third-Country Transfers: A Look at the Supreme Court’s Latest Immigration Ruling

Today, the Supreme Court quietly but decisively sided with the Trump administration’s efforts to accelerate deportations, including the controversial practice of sending migrants to “third countries” where they often have no family, community ties, or cultural roots. By lifting a nationwide injunction imposed by a federal judge in Boston, the Court has cleared the way…

Weighing the Evidence: The Federal Case Against Kilmar Abrego Garcia

I’ve previously written about the troubling deportation of Kilmar Abrego Garcia, a Maryland father who was removed from the United States without the benefit of a full and fair legal process. My position then—and now—was simple: every individual, regardless of status, deserves due process under the law. If there were grounds to believe Garcia had…

Reflecting on the South Sudan Deportations

The Trump administration recently carried out the deportation of Asian immigrants to South Sudan—a nation torn apart by decades of brutal civil war and widely regarded as one of the most dangerous and unstable regions on the planet. According to a report by Politico, this controversial move may have been in direct violation of an…

Law, Mercy, and the Migrant: Reflecting on the Supreme Court’s TPS Decision for Venezuelans

The Supreme Court handed down a landmark decision affirming President Trump’s authority to end Temporary Protected Status (TPS) for approximately 350,000 Venezuelan nationals. These individuals were originally granted protection due to the collapse of civil society in Venezuela—rampant political persecution, economic devastation, and violence that made safe return virtually impossible. For years, they’ve lived and…

Citizenship, Sovereignty, and the Scales of Justice

The Supreme Court is once again at the center of a national debate with far-reaching consequences. At stake is President Trump’s Executive Order 14160, which aims to end birthright citizenship for children born on U.S. soil to non-citizen parents. This move reignites a long-standing and emotionally charged conversation about the meaning of citizenship, national sovereignty,…

Justice, Race, and Refuge: President Trump’s South African Refugee Policy

President Trump’s recent move to grant expedited refugee status to 59 white South Africans—mostly Afrikaners—has ignited a fierce debate across both sides of the Atlantic. Citing racial discrimination, violence, and the threat of land expropriation, President Trump argues that these individuals are fleeing state-backed persecution. The South African government vehemently denies any racial targeting, accusing…

Faith, Law, and the Alien Enemies Act

On Thursday, U.S. District Judge Fernando Rodriguez Jr.—appointed by President Trump himself—issued a permanent injunction against the Trump administration’s use of the Alien Enemies Act (AEA) of 1798 to deport alleged members of the violent Venezuelan gang Tren de Aragua. For those of us who stand at the intersection of faith, constitutional conservatism, and common…

Debunking the Myths About Kilmar Abrego Garcia

In the age of misinformation, rumors have a nasty habit of snowballing into “facts.” One of the more persistent ones floating around is that Kilmar Abrego Garcia was deemed a gang leader and human trafficker by two judges. Let’s break that down and separate truth from fiction. Claim #1: “Two judges found him to be…