History, Power, and the Peril of Governing by Spectacle

The controversy surrounding President Trump’s attempted National Guard deployments to major U.S. cities is not merely a skirmish over public safety policy. It is a revealing moment about how power is exercised, justified, and constrained in a constitutional republic, and about what happens when political theater collides with historical and legal reality. At its core,…

Covenant, Coercion, and the Moral Shape of Peace

Russia’s vow to adopt a “tougher” negotiating stance—issued after blaming Ukraine for an alleged attempt to attack Vladimir Putin’s residence—should be read less as a reaction to new facts and more as a deliberate reframing of the moral terrain. By asserting victimhood without transparent verification, Moscow seeks to shift the burden of legitimacy, recast itself…

Credibility, Authority, and the Cost of Confusing Power with Truth

The controversy surrounding Donald Trump’s response to Russia’s claim that Ukraine attempted a drone attack near a residence associated with Vladimir Putin is not merely about diplomatic tone. It’s about something more foundational: how authority is exercised, how truth is discerned, and how public power either restrains or amplifies deception in moments of global consequence.…

Diplomacy Without Moral Gravity

Yesterday’s negotiations between Volodymyr Zelenskyy and Donald Trump arrive at a moment of deep fatigue: military, political, and psychological. After years of war, there’s a natural hunger for an off-ramp, a framework that promises stability and relief from endless escalation. The talks are presented as pragmatic, results-oriented, and refreshingly unconcerned with ideological grandstanding. That tone…

When Government Authority Slips from Law into Moral Theater

The recent actions by Republican leadership in Texas and Florida aimed at the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) deserve more than reflexive applause or predictable outrage. They require sober analysis. Whatever one thinks of CAIR’s activism, rhetoric, or policy positions, the mechanism being used against it should trouble anyone who takes constitutional limits seriously. These…

Power, Persecution, and the Cross

Yesterday’s U.S. strike against Islamic State–linked militants operating in Nigeria, reportedly carried out with the approval and cooperation of the Nigerian government, landed with the kind of moral thud that foreign-policy decisions rarely avoid. President Trump framed the action in part as a response to violence that has included the targeting of Christians, a claim…

Strength, Scruples, and the Question of Purity

President Trump’s decision to deploy U.S. forces near Venezuela has landed squarely in the middle of a long-running American struggle: how to exercise power responsibly in a world where every option carries moral risk. On the surface, the debate appears to be about strategy, legality, and geopolitics. Supporters emphasize deterrence, border security, and the disruption…

Moral Clarity in an Age of Evasion: Veterans, Abortion, and the Cost of Conviction

The controversy surrounding the Trump administration’s decision to reverse the Veterans Affairs abortion policy has been framed as a dispute over healthcare access, administrative authority, or political ideology. But those framings, while convenient, are ultimately evasions. At its core, this debate concerns whether the federal government should actively participate in the deliberate ending of innocent…

The “Golden Fleet,” Deism, and the Perils of Designing a World You Refuse to Govern

The U.S. Navy’s so-called Golden Fleet initiative sketches a vision that is at once ambitious and revealing. At the surface level, the story is about ships: numbers, readiness, industrial capacity, and the strategic anxieties of an increasingly dangerous world. But beneath the steel and spreadsheets lies a deeper question about how America understands power, responsibility,…