Donald Trump has never been one to tiptoe around economic policy, and his latest proposal for “reciprocal” tariffs is yet another example of his willingness to shake up the status quo. By calling for tariffs that match the trade barriers other countries impose on American goods, Trump is challenging both allies and rivals to play fair—or pay the price.

But is this a masterstroke of economic fairness, or is it a reckless gamble that could backfire on American businesses and consumers? As an independent Christian conservative, I believe this plan has merit, but it must be implemented wisely.

We need fair trade, not isolationism. America should never turn its back on free markets, but free trade only works when both sides play by the same rules—and too often, they don’t. Trump is right to call out the hypocrisy of foreign governments that benefit from U.S. economic power while shielding their own industries. However, there’s a right way and a wrong way to fix this, and the wrong way would be to sidestep Congress and govern by executive fiat.

The Case for Reciprocal Tariffs: Leveling the Playing Field

For decades, America has followed the rules of so-called “free trade”, only to find that other nations were gaming the system. Countries like China, India, Japan, Canada, and the European Union impose heavy tariffs, burdensome regulations, and industry-specific subsidies while enjoying near-unfettered access to U.S. markets. This has led to crippling trade deficits, the outsourcing of American jobs, and the decline of entire industries.

Trump’s proposal for reciprocal tariffs makes perfect sense—if these nations don’t believe in free trade, why should we let them take advantage of America’s open markets? A level playing field is the only way free trade can function properly.

The fearmongering from globalists—claiming tariffs will devastate the economy—is overblown. The real danger isn’t fair trade policies, but the continued erosion of American manufacturing and industry. If foreign countries want access to the greatest consumer market on earth, they should expect to treat American businesses with fairness and respect.

The Case for Free Trade: Why Tariffs Alone Aren’t the Answer

That being said, tariffs are a tool, not a long-term solution. America became the world’s economic superpower not through protectionism, but through competition, innovation, and free markets. While tariffs can force negotiations and level the playing field, they should never become a permanent strategy.

History has shown that prolonged trade wars can lead to higher consumer prices, economic stagnation, and retaliatory tariffs that hurt American farmers and manufacturers. This is why Trump must be careful—tariffs should be a means to an end, not an end in themselves.

If Trump truly wants to protect American workers and industries, he should fight for stronger free trade agreements that remove unfair tariffs and barriers altogether. Instead of simply punishing bad actors, the U.S. should lead by example—showing the world that true free trade is the best path forward when enforced fairly.

Circumventing Congress? A Mistake That Undermines Long-Term Success

One of the most troubling aspects of Trump’s plan is the suggestion that his administration might use executive power to impose tariffs without congressional approval. The Trade Act and the International Emergency Economic Powers Act allow the president to take certain actions, but relying on these laws to bypass Congress would be a serious mistake.

As a conservative, I believe in constitutional government. That means respecting the separation of powers and ensuring that major policy changes—especially those affecting global trade and the economy—are passed through Congress. Otherwise, any reforms made by one administration can easily be undone by the next.

If Trump wants these tariffs and trade policies to last, he must persuade Congress to act. This is where true leadership comes in. Rather than issuing executive orders that will disappear the moment a Democrat takes office, Trump should make the case to Republicans and moderate Democrats that America’s long-term economic strength depends on fair trade policies that put our country first.

A permanent legislative solution—rather than a temporary executive action—would give American businesses and workers the stability they need. Otherwise, Trump’s tariffs might last only as long as his presidency, leaving American industry vulnerable to whiplash every election cycle.

What a Strong America-First Trade Policy Should Look Like

Trump’s instincts are correct, but for this plan to succeed, it needs to be implemented with wisdom and foresight. Here’s what a truly America-first trade policy should look like:

1. Tariffs as a Negotiating Tool, not a Permanent Fixture – Reciprocal tariffs should be used strategically to bring countries to the table, but they should not replace free trade agreements that benefit American businesses and consumers.
2. Congress Must Be Involved – Any lasting trade policy must go through Congress. If Trump wants real economic change, he must lead the legislative fight—not just rely on executive power.
3. Protect American Workers but Avoid Unnecessary Economic Disruptions – While it’s important to stand up to unfair trade practices, tariffs should not come at the expense of American farmers, manufacturers, and consumers.
4. Maintain Strong Alliances While Demanding Fairness – America should push back against the EU’s overreach in tech and taxation, but we shouldn’t burn bridges unnecessarily. Strong economic partnerships are still valuable.
5. Strengthen Energy Independence – Trump’s push for increased oil and gas sales to India is a step in the right direction. America should be energy independent so that we are not at the mercy of foreign economies.

Final Verdict: A Bold Plan That Needs the Right Execution

Trump’s tariff strategy is disruptive, aggressive, and risky—but it’s also necessary. America cannot continue to be the world’s economic doormat, allowing other nations to reap the benefits of our free market while shielding their own economies.

However, for this plan to work, Trump must respect the Constitution, work with Congress, and focus on long-term solutions rather than short-term wins. If implemented correctly, this plan could force real change. If handled recklessly, it could lead to economic instability. Trump has the right instincts, but now he must show true leadership—building coalitions, winning congressional support, and creating lasting reforms that put America first for generations to come.