Recent developments in Israel’s fight against those who seek to “wipe them off the map” have been nothing short of a whirlwind, each event carrying profound implications. As an independent Christian conservative, I view these unfolding events with a heart anchored in Scripture and a deep longing for truth, peace, and justice. This conflict is not just a geopolitical struggle; it is a sobering reminder of human frailty and the depths of sin in a fallen world. Navigating these complexities requires not only discernment but also an unwavering commitment to moral clarity and biblical principles.

The Senate’s Rejection of Sanders’ Resolutions

First, let’s address Bernie Sanders’ attempts to block U.S. arms sales to Israel. These measures were shot down in the Senate, reflecting bipartisan recognition of Israel’s right to defend itself. From a Christian standpoint, Genesis 12:3 reminds us of God’s promise to bless those who bless Israel. That doesn’t mean rubber-stamping every action Israel takes, but it does affirm a special role for this nation in God’s plan.

Here’s the rub: while I stand with Israel’s right to defend itself against terror, I’m wary of what prolonged war means for innocent lives. Hamas, a recognized terrorist organization, uses civilians as shields, dragging its people into harm’s way while targeting Israeli civilians. Cutting off weapons to Israel would only embolden such evil, and the Senate made the right call here.

The U.S. Veto on a UN Ceasefire Resolution

The U.S. veto at the UN was another complicated but necessary step. The resolution called for an unconditional ceasefire in Gaza—something that sounds noble on the surface but ignores a crucial point: the hostages held by Hamas. Ceasefires can’t be one-sided. They must be rooted in justice, not a mere pause that lets one side regroup for more bloodshed.

The Biden administration’s veto underscores the need to prioritize freeing innocent hostages and dismantling Hamas’s terror infrastructure before peace can be achieved. True peace requires more than the absence of gunfire; it demands accountability.

ICC Arrest Warrants

The International Criminal Court’s decision to issue arrest warrants for Benjamin Netanyahu and others adds fuel to an already blazing fire. Here’s my issue: the ICC has a habit of targeting certain nations while turning a blind eye to atrocities elsewhere. Where are the arrest warrants for the leaders of Hamas, whose entire modus operandi violates every principle of just war?

Sure, the ICC has issued arrest warrants for several Hamas leaders, including Mohammed Deif, the military commander. However, other key figures within Hamas have not been subject to such warrants but should be, given their roles in orchestrating and perpetuating acts of terrorism. For instance:

• Yahya Sinwar: As the leader of Hamas in the Gaza Strip, Sinwar has been instrumental in planning and executing attacks against Israeli civilians. His leadership has been marked by a commitment to violent resistance, making him a prime candidate for ICC scrutiny.
• Ismail Haniyeh: Serving as the head of Hamas’s Political Bureau, Haniyeh has been a vocal proponent of the organization’s militant activities. His public endorsements of violence and refusal to recognize Israel’s right to exist contribute to the ongoing conflict.
• Khaled Mashal: Formerly the chief of Hamas’s Political Bureau, Mashal continues to influence the group’s strategies from abroad. His involvement in fundraising and diplomatic efforts supports Hamas’s military operations.

These individuals hold significant responsibility for Hamas’s actions, which include targeting civilians and employing tactics that violate international law. The ICC’s mandate to prosecute war crimes and crimes against humanity should extend to these leaders to ensure accountability and justice.

It’s important to note that Hamas is designated as a terrorist organization by multiple countries, including the United States, Canada, and the European Union. Their leadership’s actions have consistently undermined peace efforts and perpetuated violence in the region.

As believers, we are called to seek justice (Micah 6:8), but justice must be impartial. If the ICC’s actions are perceived as politically motivated, they only sow more division and hinder the pursuit of true peace.

A Ceasefire with Hezbollah

Now, the proposed ceasefire with Hezbollah in Lebanon might signal a glimmer of hope. This is a strategic pivot that allows Israel to focus on dismantling Hamas while preventing a wider regional war. However, let’s not forget the broader implications: Hezbollah is a proxy of Iran, a nation that has openly vowed to destroy Israel. Any agreement with Hezbollah must be entered into with eyes wide open, knowing that it may only be a temporary reprieve.

From a Christian perspective, peace is always the ideal (Matthew 5:9), but it must never come at the expense of truth or security. If this ceasefire can stabilize the northern front and save lives, it’s worth pursuing—but only with a clear understanding of Hezbollah’s and Iran’s long-term intentions.

Conclusion: The Balancing Act

These events highlight the delicate balancing act Israel and its allies face. Supporting Israel’s right to defend itself, ensuring justice for victims of terror, and seeking peace in a region rife with hostility are not mutually exclusive goals—but they require wisdom and moral clarity.

As Christians, we must pray for the peace of Jerusalem (Psalm 122:6) and for leaders to act with courage and righteousness. We must also remember that true peace will ultimately come not through politics or diplomacy but through the Prince of Peace, Jesus Christ. Until that day, let us stand firmly for justice and mercy, always striving to be “wise as serpents and harmless as doves” (Matthew 10:16).