As an independent Christian conservative, I often find myself balancing two values: loyalty to traditional principles and a commitment to truth. Pete Hegseth, a Fox News personality and Army veteran, has been thrust into the spotlight with his nomination for Secretary of Defense, and the controversies surrounding him are impossible to ignore.

First, let’s give credit where it’s due. Hegseth is no stranger to service. As a combat veteran, he has walked the walk, experiencing firsthand the sacrifices demanded of our military. His time in Iraq and Afghanistan, along with his advocacy for veterans, speaks to a man who deeply values our nation’s defenders. That perspective is sorely needed in a Pentagon often bogged down by bureaucracy and politics. Hegseth has the potential to be a disruptive force—and in the right context, disruption can be a blessing.

But with leadership comes accountability, and this is where things get tricky.

One of the most troubling allegations against Hegseth involves a 2017 accusation of sexual assault. While he denied wrongdoing and settled the matter out of court, the shadow of such allegations must be addressed transparently. As Christians, we believe in redemption but also in accountability. If these allegations are false, let’s see the evidence that clears his name. If there’s more to the story, he must own up to it. The highest levels of public service demand a spotless record—or at least repentance for past mistakes. Sweeping controversies under the rug serves no one.

Then there’s the matter of his outspoken opposition to women in combat. This is a nuanced debate, but Hegseth’s position—expressed without much grace—has alienated even some conservative allies. Scripture teaches us that men and women have distinct, complementary roles. However, it also shows us examples of strong women, from Deborah the judge to Esther the queen, stepping into critical leadership roles. While I share some of Hegseth’s concerns about maintaining military effectiveness, his approach should reflect respect and thoughtfulness, not combativeness.

Lastly, the allegations of extremism-related tattoos and insider threat designations during his military service raise questions that demand clear answers. Christians are called to discernment, and while we must be cautious about jumping to conclusions, transparency here is vital. A leader who cannot be forthright about his past risks undermining trust.

At the heart of this debate lies a bigger question: Are we prioritizing political loyalty over biblical principles? It’s tempting to rally behind someone simply because they share our values or align with our political tribe. But we must remember that conservatism—real conservatism—is about more than slogans. It’s about character, wisdom, and the willingness to lead with integrity.

I want to believe Pete Hegseth is the right man for this job. His military service and passion for America are admirable, but the controversies clouding his nomination cannot be ignored. If he is confirmed, let it be because he has proven himself worthy—not because political expediency demanded it.

Let us pray for our leaders, yes, but let us also hold them to the high standards that leadership demands. This is not about politics; it’s about stewardship of the trust and resources God has granted this great nation. If Hegseth wants to lead, he must demonstrate that he is not only willing but also prepared to meet those standards. Until then, the jury is out.