In recent reports, Vice President Kamala Harris and several prominent figures, including former Joint Chiefs of Staff chairman General Mark Milley and former Trump Chief of Staff General John Kelly, have called Donald Trump a “fascist.” Such accusations have become a staple in our political discourse, a label thrown around more frequently with each election cycle. However, when scrutinized, these claims warrant thoughtful analysis, especially considering the historical implications of “fascism” and the more substantial dangers posed by the extreme policies endorsed by Democrats themselves.

Understanding the Claims Against Trump

Both Milley and Kelly suggest Trump’s behavior and rhetoric are dictatorial. According to journalist Bob Woodward, Milley accused Trump of being a “fascist to the core” in a forthcoming book, claiming that Trump’s mental state declined during his presidency. Kelly, meanwhile, reportedly claimed Trump once praised Adolf Hitler, saying that he “did some good things,” though Trump has denied this.

Such allegations are concerning if true, and the language Trump has sometimes used can indeed be inflammatory. But as Rich Lowry from the New York Post notes, Democrats and the media often exaggerate his words, creating a perception of totalitarianism rather than reflecting the actual policies Trump pursued. For instance, Trump’s joke about not being a dictator “except for Day 1” has been spun by critics to suggest an intent to permanently seize absolute power—despite Trump’s tangible record, including his appointments of constitutionalist judges and reduced federal power, which contradicts such claims.

In contrast, Democrats have consistently worked to undermine Trump with misinformation campaigns, notably the infamous Russia collusion narrative, which turned out to be false, orchestrated by Clinton’s campaign. These tactics reveal that while both parties have their faults, the Democratic approach has frequently sought to bypass democratic norms in order to obstruct Trump’s influence, even preemptively seeking to disqualify him from the ballot. This behavior reflects a dangerous precedent, one that threatens constitutional principles far more profoundly than Trump’s rhetoric.

The Real Threat to Constitutional Principles

Democrats’ policy stances, as highlighted by the Wall Street Journal, threaten constitutional integrity by attempting to reconfigure the Supreme Court, abolish the filibuster, and entrench unchecked federal power. Harris, in particular, has supported policies that diverge from traditional democratic principles and constitutional conservatism. Her endorsement of taxpayer-funded gender transitions for prisoners and her insistence on a sweeping environmental agenda—even if at times contradictory—expose an agenda that forces radical changes upon the American people without room for discourse or compromise.

If we analyze “fascism” as the use of centralized state power to control the population’s thoughts, actions, and values, then it’s evident that modern leftist policies inch dangerously close to this approach. From seeking to silence political opponents to pursuing unprecedented social experiments, Harris and her allies represent an attempt to reshape American values and heritage without regard for individual choice or traditional morality.

Preserving America’s Core Values

Our response to such encroachments must be grounded in both truth and love. We recognize the flaws in our leaders, past and present. However, instead of adopting divisive language, we should emphasize policies that foster a return to values of limited government, freedom of conscience, and moral integrity in public office.

Let us remember that America’s foundation, while imperfect, is one that relies on God-given freedoms and accountability under the rule of law. Proverbs 29:2 reminds us, “When the righteous are in authority, the people rejoice: but when the wicked beareth rule, the people mourn.” The clear path forward is one of promoting leaders and policies that align with these principles rather than succumbing to the chaos of partisan attacks and reckless accusations.

Conclusion

We must maintain discernment, recognizing the difference between truth and political rhetoric. While Trump’s language may be cause for some to pause, it is the actions, policies, and principles that ultimately shape the moral direction of our country. It’s crucial to critically evaluate claims made by political figures and not allow baseless accusations to sway us from our dedication to the Constitution and traditional Christian values. The real threat to democracy lies not in rhetoric alone but in the deliberate undermining of democratic structures to further radical agendas.

Only by preserving a commitment to limited government, individual liberties, and moral integrity can we hope to sustain the freedoms we cherish.