On Wednesday, Vice President Kamala Harris participated in an interview with Fox News’ Bret Baier, marking a rare occasion where she willingly faced pointed questions from a network not known for being favorable toward her or the Biden administration. Some, like Rex Huppke of USA Today, praised Harris for simply showing up, knowing she would be met with “gotcha” questions aimed at putting her on the defensive. Meanwhile, Eddie Scarry from The Federalist noted that Harris’ main tactic throughout the interview was deflecting to Donald Trump, sidestepping Baier’s attempts to hold her accountable for her administration’s policies.

This interview illuminated key issues with Harris’ leadership, her policies, and the administration’s approach to governing. Despite Baier’s pressing questions, Harris often failed to provide clear answers, leading many to conclude that she remains unprepared to defend her positions, especially on issues of paramount importance to American families.

Border Security: The Core Issue

One of the most significant topics raised by Baier was immigration. Teresa Mull of Spectator World described how Baier opened with the question of how many illegal immigrants Harris thought the administration had released. Harris, predictably, avoided a direct answer, responding with vague references to the complexity of the issue. When Baier revealed the staggering number—6 million—Harris shifted the blame to Congress for not passing comprehensive immigration reform. However, this excuse fails to address the fact that the administration has actively dismantled Trump-era policies like “Remain in Mexico,” which had been effective in reducing illegal immigration.

For those who value the rule of law and the sovereignty of national borders, the administration’s failure to secure the border raises significant concerns. The rising number of illegal crossings directly impacts the safety and well-being of American citizens, as illustrated by Baier’s reference to the tragic murders of three young women, allegedly at the hands of illegal immigrants. Anthony L. Fisher from MSNBC criticized Baier’s questioning as “demagoguery,” but it’s clear that such tragedies demand serious answers, not evasions.

The Value of Life and Family

The protection of innocent life is a core principle of the Christian worldview. The Biden-Harris administration’s policies on immigration, which have resulted in a porous border and increased crime, stand in stark contrast to the biblical mandate to safeguard human life. Baier’s relentless questioning about whether Harris owed an apology to the families of victims was entirely appropriate. The administration’s negligence in enforcing immigration law, while knowing that it directly puts American lives at risk, is indefensible from a moral standpoint.

Harris’ inability to respond with compassion and accountability speaks volumes. Her defense—that Congress is to blame for not passing immigration reform—is a weak justification for an administration that has actively chosen to reverse policies that protected American families. The pro-family values that many hold dear are threatened by this administration’s cavalier attitude toward border security and public safety.

Consistent Evasion on Key Issues

Another glaring failure of the interview was Harris’ inability to articulate a coherent policy position on multiple fronts. When Baier questioned her about her past support for federally funded gender-affirming surgery for migrants in prison, Harris once again deflected by claiming she was simply following the law. Jonathan Alter of The New York Times acknowledged this as a weak response, stating that her attempt to go on the offensive by pointing fingers at Trump was insufficient. This issue is a matter of profound moral and ethical concern. The idea that taxpayer dollars should be used to fund gender-affirming surgeries—particularly for non-citizens who have broken the law—stands in opposition to traditional Christian values.

Harris’ evasive responses extended beyond immigration and gender ideology. Paula Bolyard from PJ Media rightly pointed out that Harris repeatedly fell back on the statement, “I’ll follow the law,” whenever Baier pressed her on specific policy positions. This non-answer is not only unsatisfactory but also highlights Harris’ unwillingness to engage with the very real concerns of millions of Americans who are worried about the direction the country is headed.

A Leadership Void

The central takeaway from this interview is the stark contrast between Harris’ lack of leadership and the vision many Christian conservatives have for the future of America. Eddie Scarry from The Federalist noted that Harris consistently avoided addressing her administration’s failures, instead focusing on attacking Trump. This is a troubling trend for someone vying for higher office. Instead of offering solutions or taking responsibility, Harris chose to deflect, further eroding public trust in her ability to lead.

As Jonathan Alter observed, Harris appeared “forceful and in charge” at moments, but this impression quickly faded when Baier pressed her on the administration’s record. Effective leadership requires more than just appearing strong on camera; it demands integrity, accountability, and a commitment to upholding biblical values.

Conclusion

Vice President Harris’ interview with Bret Baier exposed deep flaws in her leadership and the Biden administration’s policies. From immigration to gender ideology, Harris repeatedly failed to provide clear answers or defend her positions in a way that aligns with Christian values. While some, like Rex Huppke, may applaud her willingness to face tough questions, the reality is that Harris’ performance left much to be desired.

For those who believe in the importance of protecting life, securing our borders, and preserving the family, this interview served as a reminder of the critical need for leaders who are both willing and able to defend these principles. As we look toward the future, it’s clear that America deserves better leadership than what we’ve seen from this administration.